Re: [PATCH 2/3] xen/enlighten: Expose MWAIT and MWAIT_LEAF ifhypervisor OKs it.

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 23.02.12 at 23:31, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For the hypervisor to take advantage of the MWAIT support it needs
> to extract from the ACPI _CST the register address. But the
> hypervisor does not have the support to parse DSDT so it relies on
> the initial domain (dom0) to parse the ACPI Power Management information
> and push it up to the hypervisor. The pushing of the data is done
> by the processor_harveset_xen module which parses the information that
> the ACPI parser has graciously exposed in 'struct acpi_processor'.
> 
> For the ACPI parser to also expose the Cx states for MWAIT, we need
> to expose the MWAIT capability (leaf 1). Furthermore we also need to
> expose the MWAIT_LEAF capability (leaf 5) for cstate.c to properly
> function.
> 
> The hypervisor could expose these flags when it traps the XEN_EMULATE_PREFIX
> operations, but it can't do it since it needs to be backwards compatible.
> Instead we choose to use the native CPUID to figure out if the MWAIT
> capability exists and use the XEN_SET_PDC query hypercall to figure out
> if the hypervisor wants us to expose the MWAIT_LEAF capability or not.
> 
> Note: The XEN_SET_PDC query was implemented in c/s 23783:
> "ACPI: add _PDC input override mechanism".
> 
> With this in place, instead of
>  C3 ACPI IOPORT 415
> we get now
>  C3:ACPI FFH INTEL MWAIT 0x20
> 
> Note: The cpu_idle which would be calling the mwait variants for idling
> never gets set b/c we set the default pm_idle to be the hypercall variant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c         |   92 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/xen/interface/platform.h |    4 +-
>  2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index 12eb07b..4c82936 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,14 @@
>  #include <asm/reboot.h>
>  #include <asm/stackprotector.h>
>  #include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> +#include <asm/mwait.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +#include <asm/acpi.h>
> +#include <acpi/pdc_intel.h>
> +#include <acpi/processor.h>
> +#include <xen/interface/platform.h>
> +#endif
>  
>  #include "xen-ops.h"
>  #include "mmu.h"
> @@ -200,13 +208,17 @@ static void __init xen_banner(void)
>  static __read_mostly unsigned int cpuid_leaf1_edx_mask = ~0;
>  static __read_mostly unsigned int cpuid_leaf1_ecx_mask = ~0;
>  
> +static __read_mostly unsigned int cpuid_leaf1_ecx_set_mask;
> +static __read_mostly unsigned int cpuid_leaf5_ecx_val;
> +static __read_mostly unsigned int cpuid_leaf5_edx_val;
> +
>  static void xen_cpuid(unsigned int *ax, unsigned int *bx,
>  		      unsigned int *cx, unsigned int *dx)
>  {
>  	unsigned maskebx = ~0;
>  	unsigned maskecx = ~0;
>  	unsigned maskedx = ~0;
> -
> +	unsigned setecx = 0;
>  	/*
>  	 * Mask out inconvenient features, to try and disable as many
>  	 * unsupported kernel subsystems as possible.
> @@ -214,9 +226,18 @@ static void xen_cpuid(unsigned int *ax, unsigned int 
> *bx,
>  	switch (*ax) {
>  	case 1:
>  		maskecx = cpuid_leaf1_ecx_mask;
> +		setecx = cpuid_leaf1_ecx_set_mask;
>  		maskedx = cpuid_leaf1_edx_mask;
>  		break;
>  
> +	case CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF:
> +		/* Synthesize the values.. */
> +		*ax = 0;
> +		*bx = 0;
> +		*cx = cpuid_leaf5_ecx_val;
> +		*dx = cpuid_leaf5_edx_val;
> +		return;
> +
>  	case 0xb:
>  		/* Suppress extended topology stuff */
>  		maskebx = 0;
> @@ -232,9 +253,75 @@ static void xen_cpuid(unsigned int *ax, unsigned int 
> *bx,
>  
>  	*bx &= maskebx;
>  	*cx &= maskecx;
> +	*cx |= setecx;
>  	*dx &= maskedx;
> +
>  }
>  
> +static bool __init xen_check_mwait(void)
> +{
> +#if CONFIG_ACPI

#ifdef

> +	struct xen_platform_op op = {
> +		.cmd			= XENPF_set_processor_pminfo,
> +		.u.set_pminfo.id	= -1,
> +		.u.set_pminfo.type	= XEN_PM_PDC,
> +	};
> +	uint32_t buf[3];
> +	unsigned int ax, bx, cx, dx;
> +	unsigned int mwait_mask;
> +
> +	/* We need to determine whether it is OK to expose the MWAIT
> +	 * capability to the kernel to harvest deeper than C3 states from ACPI
> +	 * _CST using the processor_harvest_xen.c module. For this to work, we
> +	 * need to gather the MWAIT_LEAF values (which the cstate.c code
> +	 * checks against). The hypervisor won't expose the MWAIT flag because
> +	 * it would break backwards compatibility; so we will find out directly
> +	 * from the hardware and hypercall.
> +	 */
> +	if (!xen_initial_domain())
> +		return false;
> +
> +	ax = 1;
> +	cx = 0;
> +
> +	native_cpuid(&ax, &bx, &cx, &dx);
> +
> +	mwait_mask = (1 << (X86_FEATURE_EST % 32)) |
> +		     (1 << (X86_FEATURE_MWAIT % 32));
> +
> +	if ((cx & mwait_mask) != mwait_mask)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* We need to emulate the MWAIT_LEAF and for that we need both
> +	 * ecx and edx. The hypercall provides only partial information.
> +	 */
> +
> +	ax = CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF;
> +	bx = 0;
> +	cx = 0;
> +	dx = 0;
> +
> +	native_cpuid(&ax, &bx, &cx, &dx);
> +
> +	/* Ask the Hypervisor whether to clear ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH. If so,
> +	 * don't expose MWAIT_LEAF and let ACPI pick the IOPORT version of C3.
> +	 */
> +	buf[0] = ACPI_PDC_REVISION_ID;
> +	buf[1] = 1;
> +	buf[2] = (ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP | ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP);
> +
> +	set_xen_guest_handle(op.u.set_pminfo.pdc, buf);
> +
> +	if ((HYPERVISOR_dom0_op(&op) == 0) &&
> +	    (buf[2] & (ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH))) {
> +		cpuid_leaf5_ecx_val = cx;
> +		cpuid_leaf5_edx_val = dx;
> +	}
> +	return true;
> +#else
> +	return false;
> +#endif
> +}
>  static void __init xen_init_cpuid_mask(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned int ax, bx, cx, dx;
> @@ -261,6 +348,9 @@ static void __init xen_init_cpuid_mask(void)
>  	/* Xen will set CR4.OSXSAVE if supported and not disabled by force */
>  	if ((cx & xsave_mask) != xsave_mask)
>  		cpuid_leaf1_ecx_mask &= ~xsave_mask; /* disable XSAVE & OSXSAVE */
> +
> +	if (xen_check_mwait())
> +		cpuid_leaf1_ecx_set_mask = (1 << (X86_FEATURE_MWAIT % 32));
>  }
>  
>  static void xen_set_debugreg(int reg, unsigned long val)
> diff --git a/include/xen/interface/platform.h 
> b/include/xen/interface/platform.h
> index c168468..6220b98 100644
> --- a/include/xen/interface/platform.h
> +++ b/include/xen/interface/platform.h
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE_STRUCT(xenpf_getidletime_t);
>  #define XEN_PM_CX   0
>  #define XEN_PM_PX   1
>  #define XEN_PM_TX   2
> -
> +#define XEN_PM_PDC  3
>  /* Px sub info type */
>  #define XEN_PX_PCT   1
>  #define XEN_PX_PSS   2
> @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ struct xen_processor_performance {
>  };
>  DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE_STRUCT(xen_processor_performance);
>  
> +DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE(uint32_t);

Do you really need to introduce (step by step) handles for all those
uintNN_t types in a way different from Xen's
(__DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(uint32, uint32_t))?

Looks good to me otherwise.

Jan

>  struct xenpf_set_processor_pminfo {
>  	/* IN variables */
>  	uint32_t id;    /* ACPI CPU ID */
> @@ -293,6 +294,7 @@ struct xenpf_set_processor_pminfo {
>  	union {
>  		struct xen_processor_power          power;/* Cx: _CST/_CSD */
>  		struct xen_processor_performance    perf; /* Px: _PPC/_PCT/_PSS/_PSD */
> +		GUEST_HANDLE(uint32_t)              pdc;
>  	};
>  };
>  DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE_STRUCT(xenpf_set_processor_pminfo);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.48.g85da4d


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/