Re: [PATCH v2] USB: Support for LPC32xx SoC

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Saturday 25 February 2012, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Unfortunately, the way that ohci handles the abstraction between the
> > various implementations is backwards, it would be much easier if the
> > main driver was following that model to start with.
> 
> ... exactly for that reason I didn't suggest it. Looking at other ohci-sources
> (e.g. ohci-omap.c), machine_is_* seems to be the consistent use-case.

I still hope that someone takes the time to convert ohci and ehci into
something more regular, building the .c files separately instead of the
conditional #include "foo.c" inside of the main file.

Alan and Greg, do you know if anyone is working on that, and if not do you
think someone should do it?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/