Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] mm: lru_lock splitting

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:31:01 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:51:36 +0400
> > Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> >
> >> v3 changes:
> >> * inactive-ratio reworked again, now it always calculated from from scratch
> >> * hierarchical pte reference bits filter in memory-cgroup reclaimer
> >> * fixed two bugs in locking, found by Hugh Dickins
> >> * locking functions slightly simplified
> >> * new patch for isolated pages accounting
> >> * new patch with lru interleaving
> >>
> >> This patchset is based on next-20120210
> >>
> >> git: https://github.com/koct9i/linux/commits/lruvec-v3
> >>
> >
> > I wonder.... I just wonder...if we can split a lruvec in a zone into small
> > pieces of lruvec and have splitted LRU-lock per them, do we need per-memcg-lrulock ?
> 
> What per-memcg-lrulock? I don't have it.
> last patch splits lruvecs in memcg with the same factor.
> 
Okay, I missed it.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/