Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 02/26/2012 09:57 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:53:56PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
>> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl between commit
>> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl ("x32: Add x32 system calls to
>> syscall/syscall_64.tbl") from the tip tree and commit "syscalls, x86: add
>> __NR_kcmp syscall" from the akpm tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) but did not know if this call should be marked
>> "common".
> 
> Hi Stephen, letme fetch both trees to figure out what this new column means.
> Will ping back shortly. Thanks!
> 
> 	Cyrill

Hi Cyrill,

"common" means the same entry point is used for x86-64 and x32.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/