Re: [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus-v5

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue Feb 28 2012 - 00:02:33 EST

Next message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: sched: Avoid SMT siblings in select_idle_sibling() if possible"
Previous message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree"
In reply to: David Daney: "Re: [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus-v5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Andrew,

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:07:46 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I shall drop
> cpumask-avoid-mask-based-num_possible_cpus-and-num_online_cpus.patch.

I have dropped that from the akpm tree today.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Next message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: sched: Avoid SMT siblings in select_idle_sibling() if possible"
Previous message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree"
In reply to: David Daney: "Re: [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus-v5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]