Re: [PATCH] percpu: fix generic definition of__this_cpu_add_and_return()

[Tejun Heo]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 09:43:15AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> 
> > >  #define __this_cpu_sub_return(pcp, val)        this_cpu_add_return(pcp, -(val))
> >
> > I think, the same fix should be applied to the lines following this patch:
> > #define __this_cpu_sub_return(pcp, val) this_cpu_add_return(pcp, -(val))
> > #define __this_cpu_inc_return(pcp)      this_cpu_add_return(pcp, 1)
> > #define __this_cpu_dec_return(pcp)      this_cpu_add_return(pcp, -1)
> >
> > Shouldn't these other operations also only give the __ relaxed guarantees?
> Yes indeed that should also be fixed.

Can someone please send a patch for this? :)

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/