[PATCH 4/6] vt: waitevent is self locked so drop the tty_lock

From: Alan Cox
Date: Fri Mar 02 2012 - 09:45:34 EST


From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 11 ++---------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)


diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
index c6720be..ede2ef1 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static void vt_event_wait(struct vt_event_wait *vw)
list_add(&vw->list, &vt_events);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vt_event_lock, flags);
/* Wait for it to pass */
- wait_event_interruptible_tty(vt_event_waitqueue, vw->done);
+ wait_event_interruptible(vt_event_waitqueue, vw->done);
/* Dequeue it */
spin_lock_irqsave(&vt_event_lock, flags);
list_del(&vw->list);
@@ -671,11 +671,8 @@ int vt_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty,
return -EPERM;
if (arg == 0 || arg > MAX_NR_CONSOLES)
ret = -ENXIO;
- else {
- tty_lock();
+ else
ret = vt_waitactive(arg);
- tty_unlock();
- }
break;

/*
@@ -1426,14 +1423,10 @@ int vt_move_to_console(unsigned int vt, int alloc)
return -EIO;
}
console_unlock();
- /* Review: I don't see why we need tty_lock here FIXME */
- tty_lock();
if (vt_waitactive(vt + 1)) {
pr_debug("Suspend: Can't switch VCs.");
- tty_unlock();
return -EINTR;
}
- tty_unlock();
return prev;
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/