Re: [PATCH bisected regression] sched: rebuild sched domains at suspend/resume

[Linus Torvalds]

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This changelog also completely fails to explain what the problem was and
> how this patch sorts it without re-introducing the problems 8f2f748b0656
> was supposed to fix.
>
> I'd rather revert the 'fix' and think about this more (its been broken
> pretty much forever anyway) than tinker on top like this.

Ok, guys, I don't care whether it's the revert or the addition of
rebuild_sched_domains(), but I'd like for somebody to make that
decision and test the end result.

I do agree that reverting is probably safer at this point, but can we
get agreement on this?

               Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/