Re: [PATCH bisected regression] sched: rebuild sched domains at suspend/resume

[Linus Torvalds]

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 16:54 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> I do agree that reverting is probably safer at this point, but can we
>> get agreement on this?
>
> I agree with reverting, shoot it in the head :-) Do you want a git
> thingy?

Well, it's less a "git thingy" and more that there are tons of people
involved with the original commit that haven't even piped up.

Srivatsa, Ingo, Prashanth..

In fact, I notice that Prashanth doesn't even seem to have been cc'd,
even if he's the original reporter of the commit that gets reverted.
Added (see lkml)

            Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/