Re: [PATCH 06/23] PCI: rescan with bus or bridge using callbackmethod too

From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Fri Mar 09 2012 - 14:11:40 EST


On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Why did you just repeat my proposal, changing "err" to "ret"?  I
>> missed the point you're trying to make.  The name "err" gives an
>> important clue that device_schedule_callback() returns 0 or errno.
>> That's essential to understanding the code.
>>
>> Your original patch has one "return."  Mine proposal has three.  All
>> that means is that the reader of your patch has to manage more stuff
>> in her head to understand the code.  That's not a benefit!
>
> ok, can we have separated patch to fix them all?

Sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/