Re: [PATCH] enhance usability of/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports

From: Cong Wang
Date: Sun Mar 11 2012 - 23:43:02 EST


Hello, Helge,

On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 00:36 +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> When writing to the ip_local_reserved_ports proc file it will currently clear
> all previously reserved ports and update the current list with the one given
> in the input.
>
> This behaviour makes it's usage quite hard, for example:
> a) The generic proc filesystem limitation of only handle up to PAGE_SIZE-1
> characters at maximum may not be sufficient to provide all your wished-to-
> be-reserved ports at once.

Yes, this should be extended IMHO.

> b) There is no easy way to disable specific given ports, you always need to
> give the full port list at once. This makes shell scripting hard, since
> you need to parse everything yourself.
> c) There is no easy way to just add specific ports or port ranges. Again,
> this would be useful for shell scripts.
>

These could be calculated in user-space, although it maybe not as easy
as you want.

> The following patch solves this problem by simply extending the parser
> in proc_do_large_bitmap() to accept the keywords "add" and "release" in front
> of given ports or port ranges and to either add or drop the given ports
> from the already existing list.

This looks a little odd, because we do "magic" things with a sysctl
file, which is supposed to be plain text file. Do we have existing
examples?

BTW, as David mentioned, please Cc netdev next time.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/