Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add a per-dimm structure

[Borislav Petkov]

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:03:47PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Err, the fact that you have UE counters doesn't have anything to do with
> > the request that you want to panic on an UE. Especially if conservative
> > systems would panic on the first UE anyway without asking software.
> 
> We have some UE events for which even a conservative system might
> think it reasonable to defer the panic (e.g. patrol scrub on a "free" page).

Right, and in that case you don't need an UE counter because it won't go
higher than 1, would it?

What my thought is, is that if the system panics on UE unconditionally
anyway (either by sw or a hw method), then you don't need to enable
panic_on_ue in edac because it does so anyway, and, as a result, you
don't need UE counters at all. So, in that case, you could "state" in
the driver that you don't want to init the UE counters because you're
not going to use them, no?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/