Re: [patch 1/2] c/r: prctl: Add ability to set newmm_struct::exe_file

From: Cyrill Gorcunov
Date: Fri Mar 23 2012 - 02:41:40 EST


On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 04:38:43PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> > Andrew, take a look please, will the changelog and comments look
> > better?
>
> Can you change this to take an actual address and get the exe_file
> from an mmapped area and make certain that the mmaped_area is already
> mapped MAP_EXEC.
>
> That will prevent out-right lies.
>
> At least then we will know that exe_file will at least be a file that is
> mapped executable in the process's address space. It's not a lot better
> but it makes /proc/<pid>/exe at almost as trustable as it is now.

This won't work for all cases. When we restore a program we map new
VM_EXEC areas _without_ vma::vm_file field.

Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/