Re: [patch 1/2] c/r: prctl: Add ability to set newmm_struct::exe_file

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:41:36AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 04:38:43PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > >
> > > Andrew, take a look please, will the changelog and comments look
> > > better?
> > 
> > Can you change this to take an actual address and get the exe_file
> > from an mmapped area and make certain that the mmaped_area is already
> > mapped MAP_EXEC.
> > 
> > That will prevent out-right lies.
> > 
> > At least then we will know that exe_file will at least be a file that is
> > mapped executable in the process's address space.  It's not a lot better
> > but it makes /proc/<pid>/exe at almost as trustable as it is now.
> 
> This won't work for all cases. When we restore a program we map new
> VM_EXEC areas _without_ vma::vm_file field.
> 

Well, it's not complete true ;) At moment all exec areas we re-map during
restore do correspond to executable files. but I think having ability to
set this symlink without requirement such as 'every VM_EXEC should be
mapped with file' is a win. That said I would prefer to leave this interface
as is, until there strong objections.

	Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/