Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree

From: James Bottomley
Date: Fri Mar 23 2012 - 05:01:37 EST


On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 19:53 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 08:14 +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > Additionally, I am the author and maintainer of that driver and I
> > don't
> > > remember ever being CCed on that patch ... or did I miss it ?
> >
> > You missed it ... I added you and Jeff for automatic cc's when the
> > commit hit the scsi tree.
> >
> > This is the mail log:
> >
> > Mar 22 07:53:17 bedivere postfix/smtp[14322]: C3A1F8EE136:
> > to=<benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > relay=gate.crashing.org[63.228.1.57]:25, delay=2.7,
> > delays=0.13/0.12/1.3/1.2, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0
> > q2MErGNT019145 Message accepted for delivery)
>
> Allright, Mar 22, that's yesterday (.au time)... that's a short time
> between notifying the maintainer and going into -next :-) No biggie,
> I'll have a look next week, it's just annoying to get build failure
> reports from Stephen about drivers I own for patches I never heard
> about ...

Yes, sorry ... it's one of those large all or nothing type series that
touches about 33 different drivers (about 75% of which are
unmaintained).

I would have checked the ppc compile if I still had a working ppc
machine. Having looked through the code, I think this is the fix ...
could someone check?

James

---

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_svw.c b/drivers/ata/sata_svw.c
index 05838bf..0bbd0cb 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_svw.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_svw.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <scsi/scsi_host.h>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/