Re: [PATCH] of/irq: add empty irq_of_parse_and_map() for non-dt builds
From: Thomas Abraham
Date: Sun Mar 25 2012 - 10:56:15 EST
On 25 March 2012 06:12, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 08:12:39 -0500, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 03/24/2012 04:27 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>> > Add a empty irq_of_parse_and_map() that returns 0 for non-dt builds and
>> > avoid having #ifdef CONFIG_OF around all calls to irq_of_parse_and_map().
>> > Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Go ahead and merge with the rest of your series.
> Actually, it's not quite fully baked; the forward declaration of
> irq_of_parse_and_map() needs to be moved under the #if
> defined(CONFIG_OF_IRQ) block (just move the #if statement up 7 lines).
> After doing that you can add my acked-by and merge it with the rest of
> your series. There is no sense merging it through my tree when you
> are the only user depending on it.
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks. I will do that change which you have suggested and take it
through the Samsung tree. But I was thinking that if it goes through
your tree, there would be less chances of a merge conflict in
include/linux/of_irq.h, a file that might see updates from other
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/