Re: sched: Avoid SMT siblings in select_idle_sibling() if possible

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 21:02 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> Anyway, there are degradations as well, considering which I see
> several 
> possibilities:
> 
> 1. Do balance-on-wake for vcpu threads only.

Hell no ;-) we're not going to special case some threads over others.

> 2. Document tuning possibility to improve performance in virtualized
>    environment:
>         - Either via sched_domain flags (disable SD_WAKE_AFFINE 
>           at all levels and enable SD_BALANCE_WAKE at SMT/MC levels)

But domain flags are not exported -- except under SCHED_DEBUG and that
sysctl mess.. also SD_flags are not stable.

>         - Or via a new sched_feat(BALANCE_WAKE) tunable 

sched_feat() is not a stable ABI and shouldn't ever be used for anything
but debugging (hence it lives in debugfs and goes away if you disable
SCHED_DEBUG).


I would very much like more information on why things are a loss. Is it
really related to what cpu you pick, or is it the cost of doing the
balance thing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/