Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] seccomp_filter: syscall filtering using BPF

[Will Drewry]

On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 2:36 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 08:11 PM, Will Drewry wrote:
>> Please see prior revisions of this patch series for a high
>> level blurb.
>>
>> This revision makes a number of refinements and tweaks. The biggest
>> change is a slight renumbering of the return codes which will break
>> existing code using this patch series.
>>
>> I believe this patch is in good shape, and I don't see the need for
>> any more API changes at this point.  I plan to start using this revision
>> more extensively, and I'd certainly appreciate any testing.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> will
>>
>
> x86 portions:
>
> Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

> What is the preferred way to push this upstream?  (Presumably for 3.5 at
> this point, but we should get it into -next as soon as possible after
> the merge window.)

A repost when rc1 has been cut is what's been suggested to me.

Additionally, two tweaks have been pointed out off list (documentation
cruft and lack if #ifdef for asm/syscall.h), which I have fixed in my
local and github tree but haven't yet reposted here.  I was planning
on just posting v17 when rc1 is cut (unless I've blithely missed it
already) and then trying to pester everyone and anyone who can merge.
:)

Maybe someone more authoritative than me will answer though.

thanks!
will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/