Re: [PATCH 1/1] ftrace: fix dynamic ftrace filter reset issue

From: Rajesh Bhagat
Date: Mon Mar 26 2012 - 23:51:50 EST


Hi Steven,

Thanks for your feedback.
I will work on the V2 of this patch to get the mentioned issue resolved.

- Rajesh


On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 09:55 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
>> That said, I may consider taking the patch, as another way of resetting
>> the tracer. I have to see what workflows it will affect first.
>
> This is what I was afraid of. The tracers irqsoff and preemptoff do not
> get reset if you echo the tracer name into the current_tracer. This
> makes different tracers inconsistent.
>
> All tracers must act the same. So, it's a no go for this patch, at least
> in its current form.
>
> -- Steve
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/