Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] m2p_find_override: use list_for_each_entry_safe
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Date: Tue Mar 27 2012 - 13:59:27 EST
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:37:07PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:52:44PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Use list_for_each_entry_safe and remove the spin_lock acquisition in
> > > m2p_find_override.
> > So this would allow us to get stale entries. Is that OK?
> I think it is reasonable.
> In practice we should never get an m2p_find_override call looking for an
> entry that we are about to add/delete.
Why don't you add that in the comment and also fix:
/home/konrad/ssd/linux/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c: In function
/home/konrad/ssd/linux/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c:810: warning: unused variable
> Xen-devel mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/