Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] MIPS: Octeon: Setup irq_domains for interrupts.

From: David Daney
Date: Tue Mar 27 2012 - 14:25:01 EST


On 03/26/2012 06:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 03/26/2012 02:31 PM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney<david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
+static bool octeon_irq_ciu_is_edge(unsigned int line, unsigned int bit)
+{
+ bool edge = false;
+
+ if (line == 0)
+ switch (bit) {
+ case 48 ... 49: /* GMX DRP */
+ case 50: /* IPD_DRP */
+ case 52 ... 55: /* Timers */
+ case 58: /* MPI */
+ edge = true;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ else /* line == 1 */
+ switch (bit) {
+ case 47: /* PTP */
+ edge = true;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ return edge;

Moving in the right direction, but I still don't get why this is not in
the CIU binding as a 3rd cell?

There are a several reasons, in no particular order they are:

o There is no 3rd cell. The bindings were discussed with Grant here:
http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2011-05/msg00355.html

o The edge/level thing cannot be changed, and the irq lines don't leave the SOC, so hard coding it is possible.


+}
+
+struct octeon_irq_gpio_domain_data {
+ unsigned int base_hwirq;
+};
+
+static int octeon_irq_gpio_xlat(struct irq_domain *d,
+ struct device_node *node,
+ const u32 *intspec,
+ unsigned int intsize,
+ unsigned long *out_hwirq,
+ unsigned int *out_type)
+{
+ unsigned int type;
+ unsigned int pin;
+ unsigned int trigger;
+ bool set_edge_handler = false;
+ struct octeon_irq_gpio_domain_data *gpiod;
+
+ if (d->of_node != node)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (intsize< 2)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ pin = intspec[0];
+ if (pin>= 16)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ trigger = intspec[1];
+
+ switch (trigger) {
+ case 1:
+ type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;
+ set_edge_handler = true;

This is never used.

Right, it was leftover from the previous version.


+ break;
+ case 2:
+ type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING;
+ set_edge_handler = true;
+ break;
+ case 4:
+ type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH;
+ break;
+ case 8:
+ type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW;
+ break;
+ default:
+ pr_err("Error: (%s) Invalid irq trigger specification: %x\n",
+ node->name,
+ trigger);
+ type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW;
+ break;
+ }
+ *out_type = type;

Can't you get rid of the whole switch statement and just do:

*out_type = intspec[1];

That wouldn't catch erroneous values like 6.


[...]
+static int octeon_irq_ciu_map(struct irq_domain *d,
+ unsigned int virq, irq_hw_number_t hw)
+{
+ unsigned int line = hw>> 6;
+ unsigned int bit = hw& 63;
+
+ if (virq>= 256)
+ return -EINVAL;

Drop this. You should not care what the virq numbers are.


I care that they don't overflow the width of octeon_irq_ciu_to_irq (a u8).

So really I want to say:

if (virq >= (1 << sizeof (octeon_irq_ciu_to_irq[0][0]))) {
WARN(...);
return -EINVAL;
}


I need a map external to any one irq_domain. The irq handling code handles sources that come from two separate irq_domains, as well as irqs that are not part of any domain.


Thanks for looking at this again, I will re-spin the patch,
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/