Re: [PATCH 1/2] firmware_class: Reorganize fw_create_instance()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tue Mar 27 2012 - 17:51:41 EST
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:47:06PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 27, 2012, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Recent patches to split up the three phases of request_firmware()
> > > lead to a casting away of const in fw_create_instance(). We can
> > > avoid this cast by splitting up fw_create_instance() a bit.
> > >
> > > Make _request_firmware_setup() return a struct fw_priv and use
> > > that struct instead of passing struct firmware to
> > > _request_firmware(). Move the uevent and device file creation
> > > bits to the loading phase and rename the function to
> > > _request_firmware_load() to better reflect its purpose.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Looks good to me.
> > Greg, if that's fine with you, I'll add this patch (and the next one)
> > to my firmware_class series you've looked at recently.
> Yes, it's fine with me:
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/