Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_failure: Let the compiler add the function name

[Fengguang Wu]

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:09:09AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I agree with your change, but I'm not sure these should be pr_info() to 
> > start with, these seem more like debugging messages?  I can't see how 
> > they'd be useful in standard operation so could we just convert them to be 
> > debug instead?
> 
> Well it tells why the page recovery didn't work.
> 
> Memory recovery is a somewhat obscure path, so it's better to have
> full information.

Nod, and it won't disturb the users unless something really bad happens.

I'm fine with the patch, too.

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/