[PATCH 03/76] ACPI: ignore FADT reset-reg-sup flag

From: Len Brown
Date: Fri Mar 30 2012 - 06:15:04 EST


From: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>

we check that the address is non-zero later anyway.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11533

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c | 3 +--
drivers/acpi/reboot.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c
index 9d38eb6..fe1fb63 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c
@@ -74,8 +74,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_reset(void)

/* Check if the reset register is supported */

- if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER) ||
- !reset_reg->address) {
+ if (!reset_reg->address) {
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NOT_EXIST);
}

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/reboot.c b/drivers/acpi/reboot.c
index a6c77e8b..c1d6124 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/reboot.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/reboot.c
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ void acpi_reboot(void)
/* Is the reset register supported? The spec says we should be
* checking the bit width and bit offset, but Windows ignores
* these fields */
- if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER))
- return;
+ /* Ignore also acpi_gbl_FADT.flags.ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER */

reset_value = acpi_gbl_FADT.reset_value;

--
1.7.10.rc2.19.gfae9d

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/