Re: [PATCH] kmsg: Use vmalloc instead of kmalloc when writing
From: Kay Sievers
Date: Fri Mar 30 2012 - 20:02:34 EST
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 01:43, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:02:39AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:05:52PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> >> On Friday 30 March 2012, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> >> > I think so. This is an interface to inject stuff into dmesg. Limiting
>> >> > that to a reasonable size makes sense. We can probably limit it to
>> >> > something small like 1024, but I don't know about the "ideas" of those
>> >> > folks who think that it's a great idea to do it at all.
>> >> I guess a page would be a reasonable size, similar to what we do for
>> >> sysfs.
>> > Ok. Sasha, as you seem to have noticed this, care to dig in syslog and
>> > systemd to get an idea of the buffer sizes they are expecting to pass
>> > into kmsg, and if they can handle a short write properly? ÂIf so,
>> > restricting it to a page is fine with me, otherwise we might want to
>> > make it a bit bigger.
>> systemd seems to use posix LINE_MAX sized buffers, syslog-ng uses
>> dynamic strings, but it chews them one line at the time.
> Ok, care to update this patch with a max size?
> And again, does systemd and syslog-ng handle short writes properly?
Printk has a static scratch buffer of 1024, we can not really process
more than that, so we can limit the /dev/kmsg write() to the same
size, I guess.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/