[RFC 0/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Thu Apr 05 2012 - 18:21:51 EST
Hello.
Not for inclusion yet, only for the early review.
I didn't even try to test these changes, and I am not expert
in this area. And even _if_ this code is correct, I need to
re-split these changes anyway, update the changelogs, etc.
Questions:
- does it make sense?
- can it work or I missed something "in general" ?
Why:
- It would be nice to remove a member from task_struct.
- Afaics, the usage of uprobes_srcu does not look right,
at least in theory, see 6/6.
The comment above delete_uprobe() says:
The current unregistering thread waits till all
other threads have hit a breakpoint, to acquire
the uprobes_treelock before the uprobe is removed
from the rbtree.
but synchronize_srcu() can only help if a thread which
have hit the breakpoint has already called srcu_read_lock().
It can't synchronize with read_lock "in future", and there
is a small window.
We could probably add another synchronize_sched() before
synchronize_srcu(), but this doesn't look very nice and
- I am not sure yet, but perhaps with these changes we can
also kill mm->uprobes_state.count.
Any review is very much appreciated.
Oleg.
include/linux/sched.h | 1 -
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/