Re: [PATCH v17 15/15] Documentation: prctl/seccomp_filter

[Will Drewry]

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Ryan Ware <ware@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 4/9/12 1:47 PM, "Markus Gutschke" <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>No matter what you do, please leave the samples accessible somewhere.
>>They proved incredibly useful in figuring out how the API works. I am
>>sure, other developers are going to appreciate them as well.
>>
>>Alternatively, if you don't want to include the samples with the
>>kernel sources, figure out how you can include a sample in the
>>official manual page for prctl().
>>
>
> I second this!  They are extremely useful.
>
> Ryan

In that case, would it make sense to put up a separate tools/testing
patch and leave samples where they lie? (I'd _love_ to keep this patch
series from acquiring another 1000 lines, but either way works :)

My current tester and harness lives here:
  https://github.com/redpig/seccomp/blob/master/tests/
and the licensing can be sorted out prior to a patch mail.

thanks!
will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/