On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:49:43AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:Hello, guys.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 04:34:06PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:Why not use 'base' below? neither unit nor base change.
Yes it's a bit strange, it was the same in Tejun's patch.
Tejun, any idea?
It was years ago, so I don't recall much. I think I wanted to use a
variable name which signifies its role - I worked out the rather
convoluted base number logic on paper first and I probably wanted to
keep the distinctions. I don't think it really matters at this point
tho. Just make sure those functions are marked deprecated so that no
one else copies them.
Thanks.
I guess I'll keep it same so it's easier to deduplicate
if someon wants to.
--_______________________________________________
tejun
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization