Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mfd: add irq domain support for max8997 interrupts

From: Samuel Ortiz
Date: Mon Apr 16 2012 - 11:23:32 EST


Hi Mark,

On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:22:57PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 03:19:49PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> > Add irq domain support for max8997 interrupts. The reverse mapping method
> > used is linear mapping since the sub-drivers of max8997 such as regulator
> > and charger drivers can use the max8997 irq_domain to get the linux irq
> > number for max8997 interrupts. All uses of irq_base in platform data and
> > max8997 driver private data are removed.
>
> > Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> CCing in Samuel for the MFD review - review tends to be faster if you CC
> maintainers! Samuel, there's a followup patch for the regulator API
> which is likely to collide with some API updates so is it OK to merge
> via regulator if the patch is OK?
Yes, the patch looks fine, you can merge it through the regulator tree with my

Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

if you think that's necessary.

Cheers,
Samuel.

--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/