Re: [PATCH c/r -mm] c/r: prctl: Simplify PR_SET_MM on mm::code/dataassignment

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:26:07AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The mm::start_code, end_code, start_data, end_data members
> > are set during startup of executable file and are not changed
> > after.
> >
> > But the program itself might map new executable or/and data areas in
> > time so the original values written into mm fields mentioned above
> > might not have correspond VMA area at all, thus if one try to
> > use this prctl codes without underlied VMA, the error will be
> > returned.
> 
> Hrm, what is the utility of these fields then? If they're not "real",
> should the kernel even bother tracking it at all? (Or, should it be
> fixed to actually do something useful?)

As far as I see they are used to print statistics on /proc. Maybe
here some hidden meaning in them I missed that's why I asked for
review ;)

	Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/