Re: [tip:timers/urgent] tick: Fix oneshot broadcast setup really

From: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Wed Apr 18 2012 - 10:18:40 EST


On Wednesday 18 April 2012 06:49 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:37 PM, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
> <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Commit-ID: b435092f70ec5ebbfb6d075d5bf3c631b49a51de
>> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b435092f70ec5ebbfb6d075d5bf3c631b49a51de
>> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> AuthorDate: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:08:23 +0200
>> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> CommitDate: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:00:56 +0200
>>
>> tick: Fix oneshot broadcast setup really
>>
>> Sven Joachim reported, that suspend/resume on rc3 trips over a NULL
>> pointer dereference. Linus spotted the clockevent handler being NULL.
>>
>> commit fa4da365b(clockevents: tTack broadcast device mode change in
>> tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot()) tried to fix a problem with the
>> broadcast device setup, which was introduced in commit 77b0d60c5(
>> clockevents: Leave the broadcast device in shutdown mode when not
>> needed).
>>
>> The initial commit avoided to set up the broadcast device when no
>> broadcast request bits were set, but that left the broadcast device
>> disfunctional. In consequence deep idle states which need the
>> broadcast device were not woken up.
>>
>> commit fa4da365b tried to fix that by initializing the state of the
>> broadcast facility, but that missed the fact, that nothing initializes
>> the event handler and some other state of the underlying clock event
>> device.
>>
>> The fix is to revert both commits and make only the mode setting of
>> the clock event device conditional on the state of active broadcast
>> users.
>>
>> That initializes everything except the low level device mode, but this
>> happens when the broadcast functionality is invoked by deep idle.
>>
>> Reported-and-tested-by: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Link: alpine.LFD.2.02.1204181205540.2542@ionos">http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.2.02.1204181205540.2542@ionos
>>
>> ---
>> kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 7 +------
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
>> index bf57abd..119aca5 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
>> @@ -531,7 +531,6 @@ void tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot(struct clock_event_device *bc)
>> int was_periodic = bc->mode == CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC;
>>
>> bc->event_handler = tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast;
>> - clockevents_set_mode(bc, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT);
>>
>> /* Take the do_timer update */
>> tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
>> @@ -549,6 +548,7 @@ void tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot(struct clock_event_device *bc)
>> to_cpumask(tmpmask));
>>
>> if (was_periodic && !cpumask_empty(to_cpumask(tmpmask))) {
>> + clockevents_set_mode(bc, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT);

For some reason above if() check fails in my case, so broadcast device
never set to ONESHOT mode. That explains the problem I am seeing on
OMAP with the $subject patch. At this point of time bc->mode is
CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED.

Regards
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/