Re: [PATCHv24 00/16] Contiguous Memory Allocator

From: Kumar Gala
Date: Fri Apr 20 2012 - 14:32:02 EST



On Apr 19, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:10:05 +0200
> Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> This is (yet another) update of CMA patches.
>
> Looks OK to me. It's a lot of code.
>
> Please move it into linux-next, and if all is well, ask Linus to pull
> the tree into 3.5-rc1. Please be sure to cc me on that email.
>
> I suggest that you include additional patches which enable CMA as much
> as possible on as many architectures as possible so that it gets
> maximum coverage testing in linux-next. Remove those Kconfig patches
> when merging upstream.
>
> All this code will probably mess up my tree, but I'll work that out.
> It would be more awkward if the CMA code were to later disappear from
> linux-next or were not merged into 3.5-rc1. Let's avoid that.

I'm looking at the patches to see if I can contribute arch support for PPC.

- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/