Re: [PATCH v9 11/25] gpio/omap: cleanup omap_gpio_mod_init function

From: Janusz Krzysztofik
Date: Sat Apr 21 2012 - 10:04:57 EST


On Thursday 02 of February 2012 23:00:37 Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> With register offsets now defined for respective OMAP versions we can get rid
> of cpu_class_* checks. This function now has common initialization code for
> all OMAP versions...
>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V <charu@xxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Sorry for being so late with my comment for chanes already present in
mainline, but this patch breaks GPIO on Amstrad Delta at least, and I
have neither enough spare time nor enough experience with non OMAP1
machines to provide a solution myself.

> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 77 ++++++++++++----------------------------
> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
...
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index f39d9e4..a948351 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
...
> @@ -898,62 +896,30 @@ static void __init omap_gpio_show_rev(struct gpio_bank *bank)
> */
> static struct lock_class_key gpio_lock_class;
>
> -/* TODO: Cleanup cpu_is_* checks */
> static void omap_gpio_mod_init(struct gpio_bank *bank)
> {
> - if (cpu_class_is_omap2()) {
> - if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> - __raw_writel(0xffffffff, bank->base +
> - OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUSCLR0);
> - __raw_writel(0x00000000, bank->base +
> - OMAP4_GPIO_DEBOUNCENABLE);
> - /* Initialize interface clk ungated, module enabled */
> - __raw_writel(0, bank->base + OMAP4_GPIO_CTRL);
> - } else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
> - __raw_writel(0x00000000, bank->base +
> - OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE1);
> - __raw_writel(0xffffffff, bank->base +
> - OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQSTATUS1);
> - __raw_writel(0x00000000, bank->base +
> - OMAP24XX_GPIO_DEBOUNCE_EN);
> -
> - /* Initialize interface clk ungated, module enabled */
> - __raw_writel(0, bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_CTRL);
> - }
> - } else if (cpu_class_is_omap1()) {
> - if (bank_is_mpuio(bank)) {
> - __raw_writew(0xffff, bank->base +
> - OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_MASKIT / bank->stride);
> - mpuio_init(bank);
> - }
> - if (cpu_is_omap15xx() && bank->method == METHOD_GPIO_1510) {
> - __raw_writew(0xffff, bank->base
> - + OMAP1510_GPIO_INT_MASK);
> - __raw_writew(0x0000, bank->base
> - + OMAP1510_GPIO_INT_STATUS);
> - }
> - if (cpu_is_omap16xx() && bank->method == METHOD_GPIO_1610) {
> - __raw_writew(0x0000, bank->base
> - + OMAP1610_GPIO_IRQENABLE1);
> - __raw_writew(0xffff, bank->base
> - + OMAP1610_GPIO_IRQSTATUS1);
> - __raw_writew(0x0014, bank->base
> - + OMAP1610_GPIO_SYSCONFIG);
> + void __iomem *base = bank->base;
> + u32 l = 0xffffffff;
>
> - /*
> - * Enable system clock for GPIO module.
> - * The CAM_CLK_CTRL *is* really the right place.
> - */
> - omap_writel(omap_readl(ULPD_CAM_CLK_CTRL) | 0x04,
> - ULPD_CAM_CLK_CTRL);
> - }
> - if (cpu_is_omap7xx() && bank->method == METHOD_GPIO_7XX) {
> - __raw_writel(0xffffffff, bank->base
> - + OMAP7XX_GPIO_INT_MASK);
> - __raw_writel(0x00000000, bank->base
> - + OMAP7XX_GPIO_INT_STATUS);
> - }
> + if (bank->width == 16)
> + l = 0xffff;
> +
> + if (bank_is_mpuio(bank)) {
> + __raw_writel(l, bank->base + bank->regs->irqenable);
> + return;
> }
> +
> + _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->irqenable, l, bank->regs->irqenable_inv);
> + _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->irqstatus, l,
> + bank->regs->irqenable_inv == false);
> + _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->irqenable, l, bank->regs->debounce_en != 0);
> + _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->irqenable, l, bank->regs->ctrl != 0);

bank->regs->irqenable trgister is manipulated 3 times in a row, each
time based on different criteria. This breaks GPIO on Amstrad Delta at
least, and generally looks wrong. I was only able to verify that
commenting out the above two lines fixes the issue with Amstrad Delta for
me.

> + if (bank->regs->debounce_en)
> + _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->debounce_en, 0, 1);

This also looks suspicious, I guess the second line should rather be:

_gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->debounce, 0, 1);

> +
> + /* Initialize interface clk ungated, module enabled */
> + if (bank->regs->ctrl)
> + _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->ctrl, 0, 1);

Is bank->regs->ctrl a flag, or a register offset? If the latter, is that
offset guaranteed to never take a valid value of 0?

Thanks,
Janusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/