Re: [GIT PULL/PATCH] gts and bfs fixes (v5).

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon Apr 23 2012 - 07:30:21 EST


On Monday, April 23, 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Please git pull (or use the patches that follow this email) the following branch:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git stable/for-x86-for-3.4
>
> Changes since v4 [https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/18/396]
> - Added Acked and Reviewed-by
> v2 [https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/9/474]
> - ditched the assembler version and used a C wrapper
>
> With git commit a2ef5c4fd44ce3922435139393b89f2cce47f576
> "ACPI: Move module parameter gts and bfs to sleep.c" the
> sampling of gts/bfs module parameters flag by acpi_enter_sleep_state
> has been moved. It has been moved out of the inner ACPI code and
> out in the more x86 specific. This means that any caller of
> the exported acpi_enter_sleep_state function needs to provide
> two parameters now: sleep state and the bit flag whether to us _GTS|_BFS.
>
> All of the callers of acpi_enter_sleep_state did that, with
> the exception of the assembler version and as well any
> third-party callers of acpi_enter_sleep_state.
>
> These two patches expose 'wake_sleep_flags' as the product
> of the gts/bfs module parameter invocation. And also use said
> flag in the assembler 'do_suspend_lowlevel()' function.
>
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk (2):
> ACPI: Convert wake_sleep_flags to a value instead of function (v5)
> x86/acpi: Call acpi_enter_sleep_state via an asmlinkage C function from assembler (v2).
>
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c | 4 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h | 4 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S | 4 +--
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S | 4 +--
> drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

Peter, are you going to take this?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/