Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: memblock - Handled failure of debug fs entriescreation

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 01:29:52 +0530
Sasikantha babu <sasikanth.v19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 1) Removed already created debug fs entries on failure
> 
> 2) Fixed coding style 80 char per line
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sasikantha babu <sasikanth.v19@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/memblock.c |   14 +++++++++++---
>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index a44eab3..5553723 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -966,11 +966,19 @@ static int __init memblock_init_debugfs(void)
>  {
>  	struct dentry *root = debugfs_create_dir("memblock", NULL);
>  	if (!root)
> -		return -ENXIO;
> -	debugfs_create_file("memory", S_IRUGO, root, &memblock.memory, &memblock_debug_fops);
> -	debugfs_create_file("reserved", S_IRUGO, root, &memblock.reserved, &memblock_debug_fops);
> +		return -ENOMEM;

hm, why the switch to -ENOMEM?

Fact is, debugfs_create_dir() and debugfs_create_file() are stupid
interfaces which don't provide the caller (and hence the user) with any
information about why they failed.  Perhaps memblock_init_debugfs()
should return -EWESUCK.

> +	if (!debugfs_create_file("memory", S_IRUGO, root, &memblock.memory,
> +				&memblock_debug_fops))
> +		goto fail;
> +	if (!debugfs_create_file("reserved", S_IRUGO, root, &memblock.reserved,
> +				&memblock_debug_fops))
> +		goto fail;
>  
>  	return 0;
> +fail:
> +	debugfs_remove_recursive(root);
> +	return -ENOMEM;
>  }
>  __initcall(memblock_init_debugfs);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/