Re: [PATCH] NFSv4: Add modalias for "nfs4"

[Myklebust, Trond]

On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 10:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:50:28PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 10:48 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:19:18AM -0400, Jim Rees wrote:
> > > > Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >   When NFSv4 is configured, the support goes into the nfs.ko module.
> > > >   However, nfs-utils seems to pass "nfs4" as the fileststem type for
> > > >   NFSv4 mounts.
> > > > 
> > > > Weren't we going to change that to nfs and use nfsvers to select nfs4?
> > > 
> > > I have, approximately, no idea.  At least the version of nfs-utils found
> > > in Fedora 17 and rawhide, it's still using "nfs4".   I believe that is
> > > nfs-utils-1.2.6-rc6 based.
> > 
> > nfs4 is still _supported_ in Fedora 17, rawhide and upstream as a legacy
> > feature, but the recommended practice should be to mount -t nfs -overs=4
> > (or -overs=4.1).
> 
> OK.  So either this patch needs to go in, or something needs to add:
> 
> alias nfs4 nfs
> 
> to a conf file so modprobe picks it up.  I figured the kernel could add
> the alias itself.  Is there a reason not to?

Yes. This is a legacy feature that we want to encourage people to move
their systems off...

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx
www.netapp.com

N‹§²æìr¸›yúèšØb²X¬¶ÇvØ^–)Þ{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±‘êçzX§¶›¡Ü}©ž²ÆzÚ&j:+v‰¨¾«‘êçzZ+€Ê+zf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûiÿûàz¹®w¥¢¸?™¨è­Ú&¢)ßf”ù^jÇy§m…á@A«a¶Úÿ0¶ìh®å’i