Re: [RFC][PATCH 8/8] PM / Sleep: Add user space interface for manipulating wakeup sources

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Fri Apr 27 2012 - 17:10:09 EST


On Friday, April 27, 2012, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> 2012/4/26 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>:
> ...
> > ---
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > Subject: PM / Sleep: Add user space interface for manipulating wakeup sources, v3
> >
> > Android allows user space to manipulate wakelocks using two
> > sysfs file located in /sys/power/, wake_lock and wake_unlock.
> > Writing a wakelock name and optionally a timeout to the wake_lock
> > file causes the wakelock whose name was written to be acquired (it
> > is created before is necessary), optionally with the given timeout.
> > Writing the name of a wakelock to wake_unlock causes that wakelock
> > to be released.
> >
> > Implement an analogous interface for user space using wakeup sources.
> > Add the /sys/power/wake_lock and /sys/power/wake_unlock files
> > allowing user space to create, activate and deactivate wakeup
> > sources, such that writing a name and optionally a timeout to
> > wake_lock causes the wakeup source of that name to be activated,
> > optionally with the given timeout. If that wakeup source doesn't
> > exist, it will be created and then activated. Writing a name to
> > wake_unlock causes the wakeup source of that name, if there is one,
> > to be deactivated. Wakeup sources created with the help of
> > wake_lock that haven't been used for more than 5 minutes are garbage
> > collected and destroyed. Moreover, there can be only WL_NUMBER_LIMIT
>
> I think it would be better if the garbage collection and limit was
> configurable and optional. I would probably turn both features off
> since I do not want to chase down bugs because a wakelock was ignored,
> and I think the garbage collection will erase stats that we care
> about.

OK, but would you mind if I added the configurability as a separate incremental
patch?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/