Re: [PATCH] bitops: add _local bitops

From: Avi Kivity
Date: Wed May 09 2012 - 10:17:53 EST

On 05/09/2012 04:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> +Local versions of the bitmask operations are also provided. They are used in
> +contexts where the operations need to be performed atomically with respect to
> +the local CPU, but no other CPU accesses the bitmask. This assumption makes it
> +possible to avoid the need for SMP protection and use less expensive atomic
> +operations in the implementation.
> +They have names similar to the above bitmask operation interfaces,
> +except that _local is sufficed to the interface name.

suffixed (better: appended)

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at