Re: [PATCH] bitops: add _local bitops
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Wed May 09 2012 - 12:46:23 EST
On 05/09/2012 09:36 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Well it talks about a memory barrier, not an
> optimization barrier.
> If compiler reorders code, changes will appear in
> the wrong order on the current processor,
> not just on other processors, no?
For your _local I would just copy the atomic bitops but remote the locks
in most cases.
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/