Re: [PATCH 1/5, resend] PCI: adjust quirk handler sectionannotations

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 09.05.12 at 18:08, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 09.05.12 at 17:54, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> My inclination is that all PCI fixups should work the same for
>>> hot-added devices as for those present at boot, which would suggest
>>> that we should always use __devinit, not __init.  If I'm missing
>>> something, please educate me :)
>>
>> That's certainly possible - I simply based the patch on what is there
>> currently.
> 
> Yep, your patch makes perfect sense considering the tree as it is
> today.  But if you agree with my sense of what it *should* be, I think
> we should leave things as they are, or work on moving everything

I indeed wondered why it isn't that way while doing this.

> towards __devinit (I'd be thrilled if you wanted to work on that :)).
> Otherwise we'd just be changing things to __init that we'd have to
> change back later.

I'd perhaps rather drop my patches then, as the main benefit
(moving stuff from resident text to init text) would go away.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/