Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] printk: convert byte-buffer tovariable-length record buffer

From: Joe Perches
Date: Thu May 10 2012 - 16:37:06 EST

On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:14 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> Is there any difference in any of the cases in terms of how printk's
> that are prefixed with KERN_CONT versus a printk that does not have
> any KERN_* prefix? If so, is there value in keeping KERN_CONT?

As far as I know, no.

It is a useful marker to show where prints
are actually continued.

#define KERN_CONT ""

would save a small amount of text.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at