RE: [PATCH v6 07/12] x86/head_32.S: Define start_cpu0
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Thu May 10 2012 - 19:54:20 EST
I just meant: please check if there are any conflicts ..
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:31 AM
>> To: Yu, Fenghua; Ingo Molnar; Thomas Gleixner; Linus Torvalds; Andrew
>> Morton; Mallick, Asit K; Luck, Tony; Arjan Dan De Ven; Siddha, Suresh
>> Brown, Len; Srivatssa S. Bhat; Randy Dunlap; Chen Gong; linux-kernel;
>> linux-pm; x86
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/12] x86/head_32.S: Define start_cpu0
>> Can you check how this interacts with tip:x86/realmode?
>When CPU0 is waken up by NMI, it's in protect mode and jumps to
>start_cpu0() which only sets up stack and goes to initial_code. CPU0
>wake up doesn't go through trampline and starts from real mode. This is
>different from waking up AP when AP goes through INIT/STARTUP sequence
>and starts from real mode.
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/