Re: About cgroup memory limits
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Thu May 10 2012 - 20:32:54 EST
(2012/05/10 19:55), Andre Nathan wrote:
> Thanks a lot Kame.
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 18:47 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> From above, rss + mapped_file == resident.
> But if you check the numbers I get from memory.stat and the sum of the
> statm fields for all container processes, this doesn't hold.
> resident = 28741632
> rss = 8192000
> mapped_file = 3743744
> Am I missing something here?
file_mapped is accounted into the memcg where it's accounted as 'cache' to.
So, you can know 'mapped_file/caches ratio' but you can't know which cgroup
> size resident share text lib data dt
> 897208320 28741632 20500480 1171456 0 170676224 0
resident - share = anon.
28741632 - 20500480 = 8241152 (anon) near value to rss.
About file_mapped, 3743744(mapped_file) * 100 /20500480(shared) = 18 %
18% of your app's file-mapping may be accounted into the memcg.
You may be able to different score if you do all test after drop-cache.
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/