Re: [PATCH] sched: Make nr_uninterruptible count a signed value

From: Michael Wang
Date: Thu May 10 2012 - 22:19:38 EST


On 05/10/2012 05:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Or something like the below.. I recently changed nr_running to int (see
> c82513e51) so P(nr_running) would also benefit.
>
> ---
> kernel/sched/debug.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index 31e4f61..954fabf 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -260,8 +260,14 @@ static void print_cpu(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
> SEQ_printf(m, "\ncpu#%d\n", cpu);
> #endif
>
> -#define P(x) \
> - SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld\n", #x, (long long)(rq->x))
> +#define P(x) \
> +do { \
> + if (sizeof(rq->x) == 4) \
> + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", #x, (long)(rq->x)); \


Oh, yes, I haven't noticed that sizeof could also be a check point.
So now we can use P(x) freely and don't need to worry about anything.

Regards,
Michael Wang

> + else \
> + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld\n", #x, (long long)(rq->x));\
> +} while (0)
> +
> #define PN(x) \
> SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", #x, SPLIT_NS(rq->x))
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/