[PATCHv2 6/7] x86/bitops: note on __test_and_clear_bit atomicity

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

__test_and_clear_bit is actually atomic with respect
to the local CPU. Add a note saying that KVM on x86
relies on this behaviour so people don't accidentaly break it.
Also warn not to rely on this in portable code.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h |    7 +++++++
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
index c9c70ea..86f3a1e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -264,6 +264,13 @@ static inline int test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
  * This operation is non-atomic and can be reordered.
  * If two examples of this operation race, one can appear to succeed
  * but actually fail.  You must protect multiple accesses with a lock.
+ *
+ * Note: the operation is performed atomically with respect to
+ * the local CPU, but not other CPUs. Portable code should not
+ * rely on this behaviour.
+ * KVM relies on this behaviour on x86 for modifying memory that is also
+ * accessed from a hypervisor on the same CPU if running in a VM: don't change
+ * this without also updating arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
  */
 static inline int __test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
 {
-- 
MST

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/