Re: [PATCH RESEND v8] gpio: Device tree support for LPC32xx
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Fri May 11 2012 - 09:22:41 EST
On Friday 11 May 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Right. Personally, I would be fine with either of my v8 (all banks in
> dt, referenced naturally by name) and v9 (one simple DT entry for the
> whole GPIO controller, integer index for referencing banks) patches.
> Consider the DT-documented mapping in the latter case:
> 0: GPIO P0
> 1: GPIO P1
> 2: GPIO P2
> 3: GPIO P3
> 4: GPI P3
> 5: GPO P3
> Not too difficult and would also be acceptable, IMO.
> So Arnd and Grant, please agree one of those and pick it. :-)
Grant is maintainer for both GPIO and DT, so his opinion is what
counts in this case.
I was merely giving the background on how we got there so he
can make an informed decision.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/