Re: [PATCH 1/1] mlock: split the shmlock_user_lock spinlock into peruser_struct spinlock
From: rajman mekaco
Date: Fri May 11 2012 - 23:10:37 EST
>> Maybe you didn't read my last email:
>> If 2 different user-mode processes executing on 2 CPUs under 2 different
>> users want to access the same shared memory through the
>> shmctl(SHM_LOCK) / shmget(SHM_HUGETLB) / usr_shm_lock
>> primitives, they could compete/spin even though their user_structs
>> are different.
>> Can you please correct me if I am missing some crucial point of
>> understanding ?
> Mlock is a very very expensive operation.
> Updating the mlock statistics is a very cheap operation.
> Does this spinlock ever show up contention wise?
I just tested for working and not contention. :)
I was just going by correctness of concept.
But I understand what you say and I will try to actually test contention
for this in the coming days.
> All rights reversed
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/