RE: [PATCH 2/3] testusb: using real device-nodes managed by udevinstead of using usbfs

[Du, ChangbinX]

I am sorry I haven't consider of that. I just want testusb tool can work with default option since path /dev/bus/usb exists on most computer, not /proc/bus/usb.
So, if I just add /dev/bus/usb to the default search path, is it ok? Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 6:09 AM
To: Du, ChangbinX
Cc: mina86@xxxxxxxxxx; Fleming, Matt; balbi@xxxxxx; hpa@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] testusb: using real device-nodes managed by udev instead of using usbfs

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:02:01AM +0000, Du, ChangbinX wrote:
> As the usbfs functionality have replaced by real device-nodes managed by udev whose nodes lived in /dev/bus/usb for a long time, testusb tool need update correspondingly.

Why?  Is this causing problems as it is today?

> Because udev path is fixed, so the "-A" option no longer need and it is removed.

Did you just break scripts that was using that option?  That's not nice, and not acceptable.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/