Re: [PATCH v2] UBI: add lnum to struct ubi_work

From: Artem Bityutskiy
Date: Tue May 15 2012 - 07:11:26 EST

On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 20:47 +0200, Joel Reardon wrote:
> @@ -1086,13 +1090,14 @@ out_ro:
> * @ubi: UBI device description object
> * @pnum: physical eraseblock to return
> * @torture: if this physical eraseblock has to be tortured
> + * @lnum: the last used logical eraseblock number for the PEB
> *
> * This function is called to return physical eraseblock @pnum to the pool of
> * free physical eraseblocks. The @torture flag has to be set if an I/O error
> * occurred to this @pnum and it has to be tested. This function returns zero
> * in case of success, and a negative error code in case of failure.
> */
> -int ubi_wl_put_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum, int torture)
> +int ubi_wl_put_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum, int torture, int lnum)

Joel, am sorry for nitpicking again, but could you please put the "lnum"
argument between "ubi" and "lnum" instead? Just feels more natural.
Otherwise the patch is OK. Thanks!

Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part