Re: linux-next oops in __lock_acquire for process_one_work
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue May 15 2012 - 07:11:34 EST
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 14:27 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:52:46AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 May 2012, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Wed, 9 May 2012, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'll set it going when I get home later - thanks.
> > >
> > > Going fine so far, but a more convincing final report tomorrow.
> > Yes, as expected, Peter's patch (+ ,) is good: that load ran four
> > times longer than the longest it managed before without the patch.
> > Just needs Peter's signoff, I think.
> Peter, can I take your patch with Hugh's description w/ your SOB?
Yes, sorry, I meant to queue it up the lockdep tree but got distracted
by other stuff.
If you want it, feel tree to take it.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/